AICompare

Cody by Sourcegraph vs Mentat

Head-to-head comparison — updated April 2026

Cody by Sourcegraph

Cody by Sourcegraph

AI coding assistant with full codebase context

Free plan$9/mo★ 4.4✓ Higher rated✓ Cheaper
Try Cody by Sourcegraph →
VS
Mentat

Mentat

AI coding agent in terminal

Free planFree★ 4.3
Try Mentat →

Our Verdict

Choose Cody if you need comprehensive IDE integration, multiple AI models, and codebase context at a low cost. Choose Mentat if you prefer terminal-based development, want open-source transparency, and don't need to pay for advanced features.

Why Cody by Sourcegraph?

✓ Higher rating (4.4/5 vs 4.3/5)
✓ Multi-model support for flexibility
✓ Full codebase awareness for context-aware assistance
✓ Clear paid tier pricing

Why Mentat?

✓ Completely free with no paid tier required
✓ Open source for transparency and customization
✓ Terminal-native workflow integration
✓ Git-aware for version control context

Feature Comparison

FeatureCody by SourcegraphMentat
chat✓✗
commands✓✗
multi model✓✗
autocomplete✓✗
codebase aware✓✗
git✗✓
terminal✗✓
multi file✗✓
open source✗✓

Cody by Sourcegraph Pricing

Free/mo
Paid from $9/mo
Full review →

Mentat Pricing

Free0
0Full review →

Which Should You Choose?

Both Cody by Sourcegraph and Mentat are strong tools in the AI coding space. Cody by Sourcegraph has higher user ratings overall. Choose Cody by Sourcegraph if you value chat and commands. Choose Mentat if you want to start free.