AICompare

Cursor vs Cody by Sourcegraph

Head-to-head comparison — updated April 2026

Cursor

Cursor

AI-first code editor

Free plan$20/mo★ 4.7✓ Higher rated
Try Cursor →
VS
Cody by Sourcegraph

Cody by Sourcegraph

AI coding assistant with full codebase context

Free plan$9/mo★ 4.4✓ Cheaper
Try Cody by Sourcegraph →

Our Verdict

Choose Cursor if you want a comprehensive AI-first editor with higher ratings and integrated terminal. Choose Cody if you prefer a lightweight assistant that integrates with your current IDE at a lower cost.

Why Cursor?

✓ Higher user rating (4.7/5)
✓ Integrated terminal for full development workflow
✓ Standalone AI-first code editor experience

Why Cody by Sourcegraph?

✓ Lower starting price ($9/mo vs $20/mo)
✓ Works as IDE plugin/extension for existing tools
✓ Commands feature for structured AI interactions

Feature Comparison

FeatureCursorCody by Sourcegraph
chat✓✓
terminal✓✗
multi model✓✓
autocomplete✓✓
codebase aware✓✓
commands✗✓

Cursor Pricing

Free/mo
Paid from $20/mo
Full review →

Cody by Sourcegraph Pricing

Free/mo
Paid from $9/mo
Full review →

Which Should You Choose?

Both Cursor and Cody by Sourcegraph are strong tools in the AI coding space. Cursor has higher user ratings overall. Choose Cursor if you value chat and terminal. Choose Cody by Sourcegraph if you want to start free.