AICompare

Amazon Q Developer vs Cody by Sourcegraph

Head-to-head comparison — updated April 2026

Amazon Q Developer

Amazon Q Developer

AWS AI coding assistant

Free plan$19/mo★ 4.3
Try Amazon Q Developer →
VS
Cody by Sourcegraph

Cody by Sourcegraph

AI coding assistant with full codebase context

Free plan$9/mo★ 4.4✓ Higher rated✓ Cheaper
Try Cody by Sourcegraph →

Our Verdict

Choose Amazon Q Developer if you heavily use AWS services and need security scanning. Choose Cody by Sourcegraph for budget-conscious teams prioritizing codebase understanding and multi-model flexibility.

Why Amazon Q Developer?

✓ Native AWS integration for cloud-focused workflows
✓ Built-in security scanning capabilities
✓ Code transformation features for refactoring

Why Cody by Sourcegraph?

✓ Lower starting price ($9/mo vs $19/mo)
✓ Multi-model support for flexibility
✓ Full codebase context awareness for better suggestions

Feature Comparison

FeatureAmazon Q DeveloperCody by Sourcegraph
chat✓✓
autocomplete✓✓
code transform✓✗
security scans✓✗
aws integration✓✗
commands✗✓
multi model✗✓
codebase aware✗✓

Amazon Q Developer Pricing

Free/mo
Paid from $19/mo
Full review →

Cody by Sourcegraph Pricing

Free/mo
Paid from $9/mo
Full review →

Which Should You Choose?

Both Amazon Q Developer and Cody by Sourcegraph are strong tools in the AI coding space. Cody by Sourcegraph has higher user ratings overall. Choose Amazon Q Developer if you value chat and autocomplete. Choose Cody by Sourcegraph if you want to start free.